Wednesday, 20 September 2017

EbookCoverWelcome to the George Quaintance blog. Your hosts, John Waybright and Ken Furtado, are the authors of QUAINTANCE: The Short Life of an American Art Pioneer, the only complete, authoritative biography of Quaintance ever written. Our book fills a cultural, historical and academic void for this seminal 20th century artist. It is packed with photos and available as an ebook at Smashwords, for the low price of $12.99. We are excited to have exclusive access to hundreds of never-published photographs from Quaintance’s personal scrapbooks and family archives. Sadly, John passed away in May 2013, before seeing the book published. We hope you will use this site as a platform to exchange ideas, information and images related to this under-valued artist, as well as to learn more about him. Please send your email to kfurtado@georgequaintance.com.

 

1937dupeWhen undertaking research for the Quaintance biography, one of the questions John and I were asked most frequently was, "Did Quaintance ever paint the same canvas more than once?"

The answer to that question was always a qualified "no." The qualification was needed because Quaintance modified several designs in order to appease censors and overcome legal objections, when certain of his images were published in periodicals of the day. Other than that, there was that pesky Kanaka Fisherman, which to date exists in three distinct variations. The distinctions are so minor, you'd probably not notice them unless you were looking at all three canvases side-by-side. Everything mentioned in this paragraph has already been thoroughly documented elsewhere in this blog.

1937dupesigBut in March 2016 a new duplicate emerged. The first version of this canvas was reported in 2013, when it appeared on an auction site. The winning bidder paid $2500, plus a 20 percent buyer's fee, bringing the total to $3000. The untitled painting depicts a water lily on a midnight-blue background, with a ghostly pair of male and female nudes emerging in a swirl from the center of the flower.

The "new" painting differs in a few particulars. It is square (37x37 inches), as opposed to its distinctly vertical predecessor. The auctioned painting was both signed and dated, 1937, along the right edge just above the white petal. The square version is signed at the left but not dated.

One wonders what Quaintance found so compelling about this image that he needed to paint it twice. As one correspondent wrote, "Wow, that was the last painting I would have expected to see duplicated!"

Comments   

#2 Maura 2017-09-08 11:10
It has conditions been easier to judge between the rewriting services, as all bloke
opinions and testimonials are gathered in identical see for you to pick the
best. Bolt injurious supremacy and as a end result bad familiarity beside consulting any rewording website reviews.

Unreservedly written testimonials choice example
you by the process of selecting the song and alone change checking that will-power fit your
needs.

Feel free to surf to my blog; Translation Trudy: http://translationtrudy.com
Quote
#1 judith ross 2017-06-21 16:41
I, too, never expected to see another such painting as I thought I owned the only one; signed along right edge on white petal, not dated but purchased by my parents in New York around 1937, measures @ 32x42. In original gold art deco frame. Painting was centerpiece of living room as I grew up. It is in photos of me taken shortly after I was born in 1938. Interestingly, I never noticed the nude figures until puberty. Always loved this painting. Now it's centerpiece of my living room. Wouldn't part with it now but am interested in knowing its value. Possibly value is less since there are two others? Did Quaintance do any similar work? This doesn't fit in with his other gay erotic art...which I knew nothing about until I came upon this website. Any info would be of interest. Judith
Quote

Add comment


Security code
Refresh